CPU Benchmarks

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives in essence an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, memory subtimings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded

The single threaded test should be limited by the linear code, and we see in both dual CPU configurations it performs similarly to the single CPU result.

3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

As the 3DPM algorithm involves no core-to-core data transfer, the 2P system can show its legs.  Here the faster eight-core beats the slower 12-core.

Compression – WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01, 2867 files, 1.52 GB

WinRAR can take advantage of many threads in a system, however a 2P system presents some difficulty in managing that data. WinRAR also likes fast memory, and so as a result the single eight core 5960X can get a better result than any of our 2P configurations.

Image Manipulation – FastStone Image Viewer 4.9: link

Similarly to WinRAR, the FastStone test is updated for 2014 to the latest version. FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and thus single threaded performance is often the winner.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

Video Conversion – Handbrake v0.9.9: link

Handbrake is a media conversion tool that was initially designed to help DVD ISOs and Video CDs into more common video formats. The principle today is still the same, primarily as an output for H.264 + AAC/MP3 audio within an MKV container. In our test we use two videos: a 640x266 2h20 film rip and a double UHD 10 minute animation short. Results are given in frames per second.

HandBrake v0.9.9 LQ Film

HandBrake v0.9.9 2x4K

One would imagine that Handbrake could take advantage of all the extra cores on hand. For the LQ film, this is true at least for the faster frequency E5-2687W v2 model, however in 4K transcoding the data transfer between the CPUs becomes a bottleneck over raw CPU performance.

Rendering – PovRay 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision RayTracer, or PovRay, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high end platforms.

POV-Ray 3.7 Beta RC4

POV-Ray indicates more of what a 2P system should show: raw power.  Here cores win out over frequency.

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

7-zip Benchmark

2014 Test Setup and System Benchmarks Gaming Benchmarks


View All Comments

  • ddriver - Thursday, September 4, 2014 - link

    Why include gaming benches, considering this product is not intended nor optimal for the task, while at the same time prosumer and enterprise tests are completely absent? Reply
  • ATC9001 - Thursday, September 4, 2014 - link

    The gaming benches are just for good FYI, considering most of the audience are gamers/ enthusiasts. However, I do agree I would like to see more prosumer workload benchmarks! Reply
  • ddriver - Thursday, September 4, 2014 - link

    Where is 3D MAX / MAYA 3d rendering? Where is AfterEffects / Premiere / Nuke / Fusion video rendering? Where is Cubase / ProTools / Sonar audio rendering? Where are multiphysics simulations? Where are all the practical workloads that would justify the purchase of a dual socket workstation and that can actually scale up so many cores?

    Instead we got games, everyday office and multimedia applications and 2 completely impractical synthetic tests. And it is not just that review, this is becoming a common practice at reviewing workstation class mobos. Almost as ridiculous as using different JS engine implementations to measure raw CPU power in mobile devices...
  • cen - Thursday, September 4, 2014 - link

    I completely agree. Anandtech used to have a server division but apparently this is gone now. I have noticed several times that server grade products get non-server related treatment, rendering the whole review completely pointless. Reply
  • xyzzy1954 - Friday, September 5, 2014 - link

    I'll second that. I just bought a 'gamer' setup, but for video and audio rendering. I also do a lot of OLAP analytics. I'd really enjoy a review / comparison of 97 to 99 systems for these purposes. Threads matter, RAM > 32 GB matters. I don't get all this hardware from manufacturers for review purposes...so I can't afford to do the comparisons. I feel confident that AnandTech would publish the comparisons if they had all the relevant tests 'off the shelf' (like they already do for game-based testing). Maybe we should crowd source some tests for them.... Reply
  • wintermute000 - Saturday, September 6, 2014 - link

    yeah I second that. SQL, virt, photoshop, blender, cubase etc. should be the kind of tests not games and office apps!!!! Reply
  • Kevin G - Sunday, September 7, 2014 - link

    I personally don't mind the office and gaming benchmarks as they provide continuity between reviews of consumer class hardware. It is irritating is they're the only benchmarks to be had though. A workstation motherboard needs some workstation tests! Reply
  • duttyfoot - Tuesday, September 9, 2014 - link

    i feel the same, if you review this type of system you should at least add cinebench along with all the other applications mentioned. Reply
  • MikeMurphy - Wednesday, September 10, 2014 - link

    I really enjoyed the gaming benchmarks. I've always wondered how these boards would perform in those circumstances. Reply
  • Samus - Thursday, September 4, 2014 - link

    To show this thing is a monster, except when gaming ;) Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now