MSI X299 XPower Gaming AC Visual Inspection

The X299 XPower Gaming AC is listed as an E-ATX sized motherboard though it doesn't exactly fit the specification. The EATX standard specification is 12 x 13-inches, but sometimes OEMs take a bit of liberty with the specification. MSI takes that liberty with this board and it measures in at 10.7-inches wide and 12-inches top to bottom. It will still fit all standard ATX mounting so we do not have any worries on that front, but as it is larger from left to right it will not go directly into strict ATX standards, hence the E-ATX designation. 

Size aside, the XPower Gaming AC looks like a standard fare motherboard as far as aesthetics go, with a black PCB and grey shrouds all around. On the back of the motherboard, we can see it has a cover on it to increase rigidity.

The board's eight DRAM slots and four full-length PCIe slots are reinforced via MSI's Steel Armor to support heavy graphics cards and also assist with the look. The three M.2 slots all have a heatsink on them, with the bottom two as basic M.2 shields - a thin piece of metal. The top slot uses a larger heatsink, dubbed the M.2 Shield Frozr. The heatsink on the top M.2 slot has a lot more mass to it which should help keep the module underneath cooler than the thinner heatsinks. The M.2 Shield Frozr also has a locking mechanism to keep the hinged heatsink (and drive) securely in place.

All the shrouds are a gray color contrasting a bit from the black PCB. The chipset shroud looks almost like a reactor core and is one of the locations of the board's RGB LEDs. The other is in the back panel IO shroud towards the top. Outside of that, there are LEDs on the board on the memory slot, to show which are populated. Overall the RGB implementation was minimal but did give the board some character. 



  

The X299 XPower Gaming AC is equipped with a total of 10 headers, each capable of controlling the fans through PWM or DC methods. The fan headers are located on the right side of the board, across the bottom, and one in the middle of the board above the PCIe slot and to the left of the left bank of DRAM slots. MSI documentation doesn't mention the power output of the headers. 

Stripping away the dual heatsinks used to cool the power components, we see a closeup shot of its 14-phase power delivery (12 for CPU). The XPower Gaming AC uses an IR35201 controller in 6+1 phase mode with the '+1' used for CPU VCCSA. This means the six PWM channels are doubled to 12 (IR3599 phase doublers on the back). This yields a total of 13 phases under this heatsink with each phase using an IR3555M 60A fully integrated PowIRstage. For VCCIO, an IR35204, a 3+1 controller, will control the single-phase VCCIO along with a Texas Instruments NexFET CSD87350Q. The memory VRMs are using Primarion PV4210 digital PWMs along with each phase using two 25A/40A NexFETs (CSD87350Q). Delivering power to these ICs is a required 8-pin 12V EPS connector and an optional 4-pin EPS 12V connector. Overall this is one of the more capable power delivery sections we have seen and it has ample cooling with dual heatpipe attached heatsinks. 

The top half of the board shows our typical arrangement of eight DRAM slots flanking the CPU socket. The 14 total phase power delivery sits above it and is attached to two heatsinks connected via the heat pipe we see snaking above the left DRAM slots and into the second heatsink. The primary heatsink is on the smaller side, but on the other end is something a bit beefier. Combined, this solution worked out well both at stock and when overclocked to 4.5 GHz. 

The right side of the board has a host of different gadgets in that area. We can see the debug LED, power/reset buttons and +/- buttons for overclocking BCLK and CPU Ratio on the fly. The EZ Debug LEDs for Boot, VGA, DRAM, and CPU, as well as a 5th LED to show what kind of CPU is in the socket. Also located in this area are the voltage read points and the Game Boost knob.

The right side of the board we are able to see the top of the U.2 port, and its 10 SATA ports on the left side. We can also see a front panel USB 3.0 header and the front panel USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) header as well. Next to it is the 24-pin ATX power connector and the header for Intel VROC. Zooming in a bit on that right-hand corner, the EX Debug LEDs cover CPU, DRAM, VSA, VCCIO, Core, Ring, and also has a grounding pad. Having voltage read points are important when extreme overclocking so users are able to know the exact voltage going into any of the domains. I would like to have seen the read points a lot larger and easier to 'attach'. MSI used to have pins on the read points and a plastic shroud around them which held the ends of the digital multimeter for you and allows leaving them in there.

Here we see a closer look at the 10 SATA ports and U.2 port for storage attachment. Eight of the ten ports go through the chipset while the other two are handled by an ASMedia ASM1061 controller. The M.2 ports and SATA ports share bandwidth so some concessions may need to be made when using SATA-based multiple M.2 devices. For example, the first M.2 slot (with the large cooler) will render SATA1 disabled while the rest are enabled. The second and third slots are a bit more complicated. I have included an image of the combination table from the manual in the gallery.

For the three onboard M.2 slots, despite the first slot being with the large cooler, it is actually powered through the chipset, as is the second slot. Only the third slot comes from the CPU, in some configurations being switched with the PCIe lanes in the bottom slot as demonstrated in the table below.

Across the bottom of the board are the headers. Located just above the USB 2.0 headers is the BIOS switch for its dual BIOS capabilities, the direct to BIOS header, as well as the slow mode switch. 

From left to right we have: 

  • Front Panel Audio
  • RGB LED connector
  • Molex Power (supplement PCIe power)
  • Thermal Sensor header
  • TPM Module connector
  • 4 x Fan headers
  • Front Panel connector
  • 2 x USB 2.0 headers
  • LED Light demonstration power header
  • System Fan header
  • Front Panel USB 3.0 header

The bottom half of the board shows off the reinforced PCIe slots and the M.2 Shield Frozr on the first M.2 slot. We can see shrouding covering the Realtek ALC1220 codec and its Chemi-con audio capacitors. The board also separates audio from the rest of the board, as well as separate PCB layers for left and right channels. For headphone users, there is a dedicated headphone amplifier which auto-detects impedance, up to 600Ω. 

There are a total of five PCIe slots, four full-length and CPU connected, while the single PCIe 3.0 x1 slot is connected via the chipset. 

Below is a simplified list of  how the PCIe slots will work with each family of CPUs (talking PCIe lanes) when multiple cards are used (the "@" symbol is used to show slot preference for the configuration):

MSI X299 XPower Gaming AC CPU PCIe Layout
  44-Lane
1/2-Way
44-Lane
3-Way
44-Lane
4-Way
28-Lane
1/2-Way
28-Lane
3-Way
16-Lane
1-Way
PCIe 1 @x16 @x16 @x8 @x16 @x8 @x8
PCIe 2 - - @x8 - @x8 -
PCIe 3 @x16 @x16 @x16 @x8 @x8 x4
PCIe 5 x8 @x8 @x8 x4 - x4 - x4 -
M.2_3 x4 x4 x4 - x4 - x4 - x4
 
SLI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Crossfire Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

The back panel IO has the following connectors:

  • 1 x Clear CMOS
  • 1 x BIOS Flashback+ button
  • 1 x PS/2 Keyboard/mouse combo port
  • 2 x USB 2.0 ports
  • 1 x BIOS FLASHBACK+ port
  • 2 x Wi-Fi Antenna connectors
  • 6 x USB 3.1 (5 Gbps) ports
  • 2 x LAN (RJ45) ports
  • 1 x USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) Type-A port
  • 1 x USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) Type-C port
  • 1 x Optical S/PDIF OUT connector
  • 5 x OFC audio jacks

In the Box

The MSI X299 XPower Gaming AC includes the following accessories:

  • Driver & Utilities Disk
  • Motherboard User Guide
  • 4 x SATA cables
  • IO Shield
  • SLI HB Bridge M
  • 1 x 1 to 2 RGB LED Extension Y Cable (80cm)
  • Quick Installation Guide, SATA Labels, Manual
  • M.2 XPander-Z PCIe Riser Card
  • Case badge
  • 2 x Antenna

MSI X299 XPower Gaming AC Overview BIOS and Software
POST A COMMENT

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • BPB - Wednesday, May 9, 2018 - link

    Sigh, I guess I can always dream about owning such an expensive board. But I can't imagine anybody who is budget conscious or not rich buying one. I wonder how MSI and the others sell enough boards like this to justify making them. Reply
  • Achaios - Wednesday, May 9, 2018 - link

    Unfortunately, the era of me dreaming of motherboards and CPU's passed long ago with no signs of returning. Nowadays, the only thing I usually dream of is East Asian fleshpots and lots and lots of ambitious girls in, out, on top and below. Do I miss the time my only interest in the world was my Pentium 4, my NVIDIA GO GPU with 128 megs of RAM and World of Warcraft? Sometimes yes but not really. Reply
  • WinterCharm - Wednesday, May 9, 2018 - link

    Hands down the funniest comment I’ve read on here in a long time :) Reply
  • Ket_MANIAC - Wednesday, May 9, 2018 - link

    And another great X299 review. Expecting at least a dozen more such reviews and expecting no review for any AM4 boards or X470 boards at all because who buys cheap stuff. Come on guys, is it really that hard? People already blame you guys to being Intel shills and all and reviews such as these only add fuel to their talk. Not that the review is bad but what reason could you have for this megaload of X299 reviews? Reply
  • rsandru - Wednesday, May 9, 2018 - link

    Agreed, X299 is going to be replaced soon anyway so even for potential Intel HEDT buyers all those motherboards are most likely non starters... And this one still sports the tiny VRM heat sink that was repeatedly pointed out as being insufficient.

    To round this perfectly marketed product there’s the ‘gaming’ in the name, as if anyone whose main interest is playing games would pick an X299 platform over a Z370.
    Reply
  • Peter2k - Wednesday, May 9, 2018 - link

    You'd be surprised how many gamers where absolutely convinced they need quad channel and a bazillion pcie-x lanes for that sweet sweet quad GPU setup they gonna have one day so that they don't throttle when using many M2 SSD's

    Marketing must be doing a great job these days

    Surprisingly it's the sort of same amount of gamers that don't know that quad GPU setups are dead
    Quad channel doesn't do anything for gaming (or most use cases anyway)

    Ehh
    As long as there are LED's on it
    Reply
  • Ket_MANIAC - Thursday, May 10, 2018 - link

    What I am baffled about is the lack of AM4 motherboard reviews from AnandTech. They are one of the few publications out here who do motherboard reviews right and just 6 reviews in over a year, out of which 3 are boards that no body ever buys when talking about AM4. Yes, they have covered a lot of Ryzen stuff lately. And motherboard reviews are generally not as important as CPU. But if that's the case, how do you justify "16" X299 reviews? And no X399? I might be coming of as an AMD fanboy, so hold your horses. I am an AMD fan. Not a fanboy. It doesn't take an Einstein to know which among the X299 and AM4 is more important and which among the X299 and X399 is more successful. Reply
  • DanNeely - Thursday, May 10, 2018 - link

    Mobo Reviewer A is doing all of the x299 boards in a single giant batch.

    Mobo Reviewer B is doing all of the AM4 boards in a single giant batch.

    The selection of boards they get to review come down to what manufactures send as press samples. There're enough of those to keep all the reviewers busy full time so Anandtech rarely if ever buys retail boards to review.

    There currently isn't an active Mobo Reviewer C, so any x399 samples that've been sent in are waiting until A or B clears his current backlog; or one of the other contributors clears out the backlog of what they're currently working on and can step in on mobos again. (eg E. Fylladitakis did a batch of mobos last summer between his keyboard and PSU reviews.)
    Reply
  • Ket_MANIAC - Thursday, May 10, 2018 - link

    Quite alright but doesn't 16 X299 reviews seem to you as pointless? I don't know if you are representing Anandtech but if you are, don't you think more AM4 stuff would bring more readership to your website? You guys have the power to choose which boards you review among the ones that manufacturers send you and I don't think it is possible that Asus has never sent the Crosshair VI Hero or the VII Hero to you(from the CPU review, I see they had), ASRock never sent the X370 Taichi to you. Wouldn't reviewing these boards make more sense right now considering the 2000 series just launched? Reply
  • PeachNCream - Wednesday, May 9, 2018 - link

    It's another X299 MSI motherboard review, because we really need to hear more about MSI products since there are no other vendors out there that produce computer parts. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now