A First Look At Apple's OS X El Capitanby Ryan Smith on June 15, 2015 3:00 PM EST
- Posted in
- Operating Systems
Right on schedule, at last week’s World Wide Developers Conference Apple announced the next iteration of their desktop OS, OS X. Version 10.11, dubbed El Capitan, is the latest in Apple’s string of yearly OS updates. And with this now being the 3rd iteration of the company’s initiative to offer free desktop operating system upgrades, it’s safe to say that the company has settled into what is the new norm.
From an OS perspective, WWDC straddles an interesting point between announcing new OSes and priming developers for them. The sole public session of the conference is the Keynote, where Apple announces the newest versions of OS X, iOS, and whatever other major initiatives they have going on. However once the keynote is done, that’s it for the public. The company has plenty of other activities going on at WWDC, but those are closed door events for attending developers. Ultimately there’s no practical way for Apple to announce something major like a new OS to developers without the news leaking, so the company instead does a public announcement to get consumers and developers excited while neatly sidestepping the immediate issue with keeping such a big secret, and then closes up to get to work on preparing developers for their latest OSes.
Of course developers can only do so much without seeing the OS first-hand, so along with serving as a developers conference and keynote backdrop, WWDC also serves as the launching point for Apple’s OS betas for developers. Over the next few months OS X and iOS 9 will go from a developer beta to a public beta, and finally to retail products. Which is to say that developers get to have all the fun of actually interacting with the OS first, as the public beta won’t start for another month or two.
And that, at last, brings us to today. With thousands of developers and no practical way to keep the OS from leaking, Apple is seemingly trying something a little different this year when it comes to engaging consumers and the press during the developer beta period. Rather than clamming up entirely – developers are under non-disclosure agreements – Apple invited us to take a first look at the beta OS, loaning us a 2015 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro with OS X El Capitan preloaded. To that end, today we are taking our first look at El Capitan, checking out the major new features of the OS and experiencing first-hand the software Apple is putting together for later this year.
Now make no mistake, this is a beta OS and it has problems like any piece of beta software does – Apple does not withhold OS betas from the public just because they like to be secretive – but it’s an increase in transparency from a very opaque company. More to the point, while El Capitan still has some debugging to go through and a few teething pains that come with it, it’s already in a state where it’s usable, where the major features are in place and working, and the bugs Apple hasn’t already squashed can be worked around by an experienced hand. So with that in mind, let’s take a look at what Apple is gearing up for with the 12th iteration of OS X.
Sizing Up El Capitan
First off, to address the obvious question in the room, why “El Capitan?” With Apple dropping the big cat codenames a couple of years back, they have now started naming OS X after California landmarks. With 10.10 Apple named the OS after Yosemite National Park, and now with 10.11 El Capitan, they have gone one step further and named the OS after the El Capitan rock formation.
El Capitan is admittedly a bit of a mouthful, especially if you’ve never heard the accent pronounced before (it’s pronounced el-KAP-i-TAN, by the way), however the name is fitting from a development standpoint. Whereas Yosemite was a major OS release for Apple, involving a significant UI overhaul along with numerous feature upgrades, El Capitan is a far tamer excursion for Apple. It’s still an important release for its own reasons, but it’s definitely an iteration on Yosemite rather than another major change; it is the Mountain Lion to Lion, the Snow Leopard to Leopard. So it’s only fitting that with such close ties to Yosemite, it’s named after a rock within the park.
Ultimately with the company no longer charging for OS updates, they can afford to take on a build-and-optimize approach, since no matter how many new features an OS comes with it’s still free. At the same time it means that El Capitan gets to build off of a solid base in Yosemite, which means Apple can focus on other areas of the OS.
So what does El Capitan bring to the table? Over the next couple of pages we’ll lay out the major features, but in a nutshell it’s an interesting combination of some further harmonization with iOS, some new features for the OSes major applications, and even some core technology updates. Mentioning iOS and OS X in the same breath always draws a few groans, and while some of the iOS elements that have come to past OS X releases has been more tepidly received than other elements, in the case of El Capitan it feels like Apple has a better grip on harmonizing the OSes without losing what makes OS X unique, and what makes a desktop OS work best.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Michael Bay - Tuesday, June 16, 2015 - linkThey are just taking after Canonical and their cringeworthy OS release codename tradition.
vol7ron - Tuesday, June 16, 2015 - linkJust curious what your opinion is about Lollipop... or JellyBean... or Ice Cream Sandwich. Android names in general are making fun at the use of names for OS versions. Regardless if they are keeping the names in a specific genre.
I also saw El Capitan and thought it was a poor name choice, but that's less of Apple's fault and more of the Mariposa Batallion, which named it 2 centuries ago. It's a fairly well known structure in Yosemite. It's the people that are quick to judge and maybe not well-traveled that seem to have an issue with it.
Alexey291 - Saturday, June 20, 2015 - linkBy not well travelled you mean 'people who don't know every damn landmark in a foreign country'?
If so then yeah I'm not well travelled. I don't know the name of every rock in every country on earth
hanssonrickard - Saturday, June 20, 2015 - linkAlways intersting tht americans think that USA is the center of the world.
They also most of the times think that everyone else should know so much about locations and names in US.
Being well-travelled doesn´t even have to involve the US. There are plenty of other countries and places to visit and still be considered "well-travelled".
For me, I had not heard about El Capitan before Apple mentioned it and I then googled it.
Rod_Serling_Lives - Tuesday, June 23, 2015 - linkYou took a comment where the word choice wasn't the best and produced a response that is just as ignorant. Kudos to you!
whyso - Monday, June 15, 2015 - linkIts marketing. And its a stupid name. Sure it might be good and function well but it still has (in my opinion) a stupid name. People aren't going to see some california landmark they are going to see 'the captain'.
melgross - Monday, June 15, 2015 - linkOk, we get it, you've got a bug up your ass about it, now leave it alone.
jameskatt - Tuesday, June 16, 2015 - linkWindows is a stupid name. It can't even be trademarked.
Oxford Guy - Wednesday, June 17, 2015 - linkAnd the new Finder icon is terrible.
shabby - Monday, June 15, 2015 - linkEven referring it to 10.11 doesn't make sense because 10.2 to 10.9 is technically newer than 10.11.
Maybe if they called them 10.01, 10.02 and so forth... right?