AMD is using the International Solid-State Circuits Conference this week to present a paper and announce some interesting developments regarding the next iteration of the Bulldozer architecture, codenamed ‘Excavator’, as well as other details regarding the CPU range that it will be placed in called ‘Carrizo’.

At the tail end of 2014 we reported on Carrizo and AMD’s announcement for its next generation of APUs, and more recently the discussion surrounding Carrizo not coming to desktop. In those announcements AMD revealed that Carrizo will be aimed at the laptop and notebook community first and foremost, a first for the company as previous APU designs have been aimed at both the desktop and mobile markets.

From a hardware standpoint, Carrizo will be combining a number of Excavator modules, AMD’s R-Series GCN GPUs, and the chipset/Fusion Controller Hub into a single package, bringing with it full HSA compatibility, TrueAudio, and ARM Trustzone compatibility. As with Kaveri before it, Carrizo will be built on Global Foundries’ 28nm Super High Performance (28SHP) node, making Carrizo a pure architecture upgrade without any manufacturing changes. Today’s ISSCC paper in turn builds on these revelations, showing some of the data from AMD’s internal silicon testing.

AMD’s presentation confirms that the new Excavator cores are low power optimized rather than desktop optimized. Support for Mantle and DirectX 12 should go without saying, and Dual Graphics support is something AMD has been working on for a number of generations. The next point is interesting from my perspective:

“Single-chip integration of the APU and the Southbridge onto a single die”

In our pre-briefing call, AMD confirmed that the Southbridge/FCH is no longer a separate chip, and is being moved on to the CPU from its previously separate package. In fact not only is the south bridge going to part of the CPU with Carrizo, but it's being fully integrated into the APU die itself. This is a first for AMD, and even Intel by comparison still uses two separate dies on the same package for their similar Broadwell-Y/U processors. As a result, AMD explained, this advances the Southbridge from the older 65nm/45nm processes to 28nm and 28SHP, reducing power consumption and operating voltage. It also allows the APU to accurately control power gating, further saving power, and reduces the length of HyperTransport interconnects between the APU and the I/O. On the flip side, it does move the soutb bridge's power consumption onto the APU, as well as the extra transistors it would otherwise occupy. This is explained in detail below.

The key element to Excavator’s design is a reduction in die area. Fundamentally everything is the same in terms of operation compared to Kaveri, but the internal units such as the FP scheduler and cache control have been re-engineered to take up less room on the same 28nm SHP process node. It seems a little odd applying a ‘high-density’ design to a ‘high-performance’ process node, but AMD is stating that part of this has been driven by the GPU team sharing its experiences and knowledge of small, efficient die components with the CPU team, allowing the lessons learned there to benefit AMD's CPU designs. This is combined with a "GPU-oriented" design stack on the CPU, which AMD is showing provides significant power savings at the same frequency, or higher frequency at the same power.

The high density, power optimized design also plays a role in the GPU segment of Carrizo, offering lower leakage at high voltages as well as allowing a full 8 GCN core design at 20W. This is an improvement from Kaveri, which due to power consumption only allowed a 6 GCN design at the same power without compromising performance.

AMD revealed Voltage Adaptive Operation back with Kaveri, and it makes a reappearance in Carrizo with its next iteration. The principle here is that with a high noise line, the excess voltage will cause power to rise. If the system reduces the frequency of the CPU during high noise/voltage segments - as power is proportional to voltage squared - power consumption will be reduced and then frequency can be restored when noise returns to normal. This happens inside the CPU over nanoseconds, resulting in no serious performance loss but it helps keep the power consumption of the APU down. In the case of Carrizo, AMD is quoting a 10-20% reduction in power consumption versus what a theoretical Carrizo would look like without this technology.

Another new addition to Excavator comes in the form of Adaptive Voltage-Frequency Scaling modules. Carrizo uses 10 in each Excavator ‘core’, and these modules can adjust the frequency and voltage of individual components depending on power requirements, temperature and other external factors in order to improve either performance, power consumption, or efficiency. With this in mind, AMD is claiming a 29% frequency increase at 10W, or if frequency is held constant then there is a 40-50% power decrease at the same 10W. At 20W, as the graph shows, there is almost no difference between the two, indicating that Excavator is truly built for lower TDP devices.

AMD is also presenting news on improvements to their ability to quickly enter and exit sleep states. With Excavator, AMD can now go from a sub-50mW S0i3 state to an active state in under a second. This should allow Carrizo devices to quickly reach and better sustain near-standby power levels, improving idle and low-load power consumption. As shown in the slide, at the S0i3 state only the ACP, PCH, and a small I/O segment are still active, while the rest of the device is completely power gated.

Meanwhile AMD is also once again showing off their technology timeline to illustrate their progress in implementing new technologies over the years. We confirmed that an interesting feature, inter-frame power gating, is active in Carrizo. This in a nutshell allows the GPU to go to a low frequency mode when the frame buffers are full. Though only a few milliseconds of power savings per instance, over time this can add up to larger increases battery life.

Wrapping up the hardware aspects of their ISSCC presentation, AMD is also disclosing the die size and transistor counts for Carrizo. Whereas Kaveri weighed in at 2.3 billion transistors in a 245mm2 die, Carrizo will come in at a much larger 3.1 billion transistors in a 250mm2 die. This a significant increase in transistor density for AMD, with Carrizo packing in 29% more transistors for only a marginal increase in die size. Though AMD is not explaining where all of the transistor increases come from at this time, part of the increase comes from the Southbridge/FCH being moved on-die, which AMD tells us will take up 5.5% of Carrizo's die. As for the Excavator cores themselves, AMD is starting that they consume 40% less power and take up 23% less die area, thanks to the combination of transistor density improvements, AVFS technology, and bringing the FCH on-die.

Moving on, although AMD's ISSCC presentation is not going to be diving deep into the Excavator architecture, AMD is claiming that Excavator will also bring with it a 5% IPC boost. We understand that this increase in IPC comes from a doubling of the L1 data cache from 64KB to 128KB, as well as further payoffs from the power improvements. Meanwhile on the fixed-function side of matters, Carrizo will be introducing a full H.265 hardware decoder. This is the first AMD part (CPU or GPU) to offer any kind of hardware support for H.265 decoding, and in the process it will be the first x86 CPU/APU to offer full hardware decode capabilities, as Intel still relies on a hybrid decode approach at this time.

Finally, AMD is also rolling out some new Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) functionality as part of Carrizo. HSA is seen as one of the next key factors in personal computing over the next decade. We have seen an almost ubiquitous shift in recent years towards almost every consumer processor having on-die graphics, and the ability to optimize a workload for each part of the system improves the experience. AMD has been riding this wave, announcing Kaveri as ‘HSA Ready’ and now Carrizo as ‘HSA Compliant’, fully adhering to HSA 1.0 specifications. At the moment the biggest benchmark showing off this power is PCMark, something AMD likes to promote.  With regards the difference between HSA Ready and Compliant, I asked AMD what made Kaveri different in that regard. The answer was straightforward enough: Carrizo is able to perform GPU context switching, allowing a GPU state-save and state-restore, something Kaveri is unable to do and offering a solid hint that Carrizo's GPU is based on AMD's GCN 1.2 architecture.

Wrapping things up, the combination of a 5% IPC boost and 40% power savings means that AMD has a range of options for Carrizo parts, picking between increased clockspeeds at the same power levels or holding clockspeeds constant for a larger battery life gain. We expect that actual retail parts will be somewhere in the middle, as the graphs in the slides indicate that best efficiency occurs around the 10W scenario.

We did ask about absolute design numbers regarding battery life, processor frequencies and time to market. As expected, AMD is keeping its cards close to its chest, especially in a more academic environment such as ISSCC. At this point in time we were told that Carrizo is expected to come to market within Q2. With Computex taking place towards the end of Q2, this should mean that a number of Carrizo devices will either be on the market or at least on display for us to examine.

 

POST A COMMENT

82 Comments

View All Comments

  • Veritex - Monday, February 23, 2015 - link

    The most recent discovered benchmark of AMD's Carrizo FX mobile scoring P2645 on 3DMARK 11 performance indicates that it has more graphics power than the very expensive Iris Pro 5200!

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/9453670

    Combined with other enhancements and capabilities such as next gen GCN with delta color compression, hardware h.265 decode, HSA ready, along with DX12 and Freesync support, you have the makings of a mobile and AIO/ITX bestseller.
    Reply
  • BlueBlazer - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    However the CPU centric physics score there shows the CPU side is still weak (when compared to the 15W dual core Broadwell-U processors like i7-5500U). And given this Carrizo FX may have 28W TDP (for top SKU), it may just end up like 35W FX-7600P or 20W FX-7500 where they are found in very few laptops only. Graphically still much weaker than most modern and recent mobile discrete GPUs found on gaming laptops. Also it isn't much faster than desktop APU like the A10-7850K. And having H.265 decoder or being HSA ready does very little actually (especially when Broadwell and even Haswell now has H.265 decoding also, additionally too few applications are using OpenCL or HSA)... Reply
  • psychobriggsy - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    One thing to consider is the price these will be sold at.

    Comparing to an i7-5500U is probably not going to be an apples to apples comparison, because that chip costs nearly $400 (according to http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-i7-5500U-N... Carrizo chips are probably going to be priced competitively with i3 Broadwells, which have a lot of features disabled.

    Additionally full hardware H.265 decoding is going to be more power efficient than doing core aspects on the GPU, as with Intel's solution.

    The real barrier to adoption is going to be the OEMs.
    Reply
  • BlueBlazer - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    Due to its pricing that's typically where most APUs end up today, with budget laptops. Premium laptops nowadays are mostly ultrabook style (very thin and stylish) which requires low TDP processors (which is why Intel had such a good run here). That's is something that AMD is working on with Carrizo (with its 10W lower range for Carrizo-L and 15W lower range for Carrizo), although they still need to match Intel at the CPU side of things also (if AMD wants to get better pricing).

    Fixed function decoders have one problem, the lack of flexibility. Hybrid and software based decoders have better flexibility. The new Intel drivers for Broadwell (and some Haswell models) can support H.265 including 10-bit H.265 and Google's VP9 (though wished it also had 10-bit H.264 a.k.a "Hi10p"). So far AMD has not mentioned whether 10-bit H.265 and VP9 is supported yet (I would assume its the standard 8-bit H.265).

    For OEM and ODM adoption, the product has to be "attractive" enough to demand a good volume. On schedule product delivery timelines also has to be up to par.
    Reply
  • testbug00 - Thursday, February 26, 2015 - link

    The CPU is not a bottleneck at that level of GPU performance in most, if not all, games. Now, if you were getting a mid level or faster dGPU, the A10-5750 drove a 7970m at 50 to near 100% of an 45W i7. So, let's cut that GPU in half, 640 GCN cores, in theory, the A10-5750 should never be the bottleneck at "playable" (45-60fps IMHO) settings. The 8 GCN core GPU is only 512 cores, so, it should performance similarly to an i7 with the same GPU setup (Doesn't exist, of course) when gaming. Reply
  • takeship - Friday, February 27, 2015 - link

    The issue with all of these APUs has always been one thing - memory bandwidth. AMD's memory controller, even in dual channel mode, even with 2400/2133 memory, is terrible compared to Intel's. Something like barely 70% of the throughput that Intel achieves with 1600 memory. You're right that the CPU is not the bottleneck - the memory bandwidth and latency are. Terrible, just terrible, on every revision of the BD cores thus far. Which is funny, because memory access was clearly a problem all the way back with the original BD AM3+ launch, and yet despite preaching APUs are the future for going on 3 revisions now, AMD still hasn't figured out how to fix the biggest bottleneck on these chips. To see this in action - look at benchmarks of the A8-7600 vs A8-7800 - fps are within 5 percent, despite the fact that the 7800 clearly has a bigger, better GPU, and faster CPU. Reply
  • maglito - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    Yes H.265 full hardware support with 18Gbps HDMI 2.0 as previously reported, and all these low power improvements, this could be the holy grail for silent HTPC (ITX / small form factor) for the next generation 4K / Ultra HD displays. An AMD NUC that people actually want! Reply
  • bleh0 - Monday, February 23, 2015 - link

    Maybe this time around there be more then 5 laptops with new APUs in them. Reply
  • BlueBlazer - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    Nowadays most laptops uses very low power processors especially those in the 15W and lower range, because that allows the manufacturer to use cheaper and smaller batteries. Also makes them thinner (like the recent Dell XPS 13 reviewed here), smaller and often fanless (especially those using Bay Trail processors). Additionally many laptops nowadays are in the lower budget range (like the HP Stream series) thus cost is an issue. Majority of premium laptops and gaming laptops uses Intel processors although you can find a handful using AMD APUs (like the HP EliteBook series)... Reply
  • monstercameron - Wednesday, February 25, 2015 - link

    hp stream 14? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now