We've covered quite a few laptop options last week for those looking for something mobile for the holiday season, but one area we haven't touched on yet is tablet options. There are several ways to break things down, so let's quickly cover the bases first. You need to answer a few questions in determining the best tablet for your needs. First up: what operating system do you want to run? You have four main choices: Apple's iOS, Google's Android, and Microsoft's Windows RT and Windows 8.1. Next up, you need to decide what size tablet you want: 7”, 8”, 9”, 10”, 11”, and 13” are all possibilities, but for the purposes of this guide I'm going to just drop the largest two options, and there aren't too many 9” tablets either so really in my book it's a question of 7-8” vs. 10” (give or take). These two area will help cut down the number of choices quite a bit, but there are still additional items to consider.

Price is obviously something we need to account for, as not everyone can simply run out and buy the most expensive tablets. Intended use is another important factor – if you just need something to do some web surfing and pull up other reference material over WiFi, your needs will be far different than someone that wants a tablet with mobile broadband; similarly, people that want to play games (or have kids that will want to play games) have different needs than those that don't care much about graphics.

Finally, depending on which platform and size you've selected, you also need to decide if you want a pure tablet, something with a keyboard dock, or a hybrid device. The first two options have some overlap, as the vast majority of tablets support Bluetooth keyboards so you can add one of those to pretty much any tablet, but if you actually want a dock – and in particular a dock that adds additional battery capacity – your choices are pretty limited. Rather than trying to come up with a recommendation for every potential area, I'm going to focus on the major options that are worthy of a recommendation.

Apple Tablets

My personal feeling is that most users are going to either buy into the Apple iOS line or they're going to go with Android – and that usually means both a smartphone and a tablet for the respective OS. There are currently four major tablet options available in the iOS ecosystem (five if we add in the iPod Touch, but I'm skipping that as most people have a smartphone these days so if they want an additional mobile device it's more likely to be a larger tablet): there's the new iPad Air, the new iPad Mini Retina, and Apple continues to sell the iPad 2,4 as their faux-budget 10” offering along with the previous generation iPad Mini. (You can still find the previous generation iPad (4) and even the iPad 3 floating around online, but we'll skip those.)

For the budget conscious, let's be frank: Apple isn't for you. “Budget” and “Apple” are like oil and water – they don't mix. The least expensive Apple tablet currently for sale is the previous generation iPad Mini, priced at $299 for a 16GB model with an A5 chip. $100 more gets you the iPad Mini Retina, and even if you don't care much about the display the A7 SoC is a pretty substantial upgrade in performance. Similarly, if you still haven't purchased an iPad 2,4 I think we can simply skip that now. That means we're effectively left with two choices, and they're both pretty expensive.

The 16GB iPad Mini Retinal has a $399 price from Apple, and that's pretty much what you're going to have to pay. Meanwhile the 32GB model will set you back $499 and the 64GB costs $599. Personally, I can get by with the 16GB model with iOS, and that's what I'd go for if you're not planning on carrying around a lot of movies or music; the 32GB model ends up being more than enough for all but the biggest digital packrats, while the 64GB model ends up costing enough that I can't really recommend it, but if you want to dance you have to pay the piper.

If you're looking for the fastest iPad, not surprisingly the iPad Air is where it's at. While the iPad Mini Retina and iPhone 5S use the same A7 SoC as the iPad Air, there's no stacked RAM on the die and there's a heat spreader, which combined allow the larger iPad Air to run anywhere from 10% to 50% faster than the iPad Mini Retina. The cost starts out at $499 for the 16GB WiFi model, and as usual Apple tacks on $100 for each storage update ($599 for 32GB, $699 for 64GB, and $799 for 128GB). I'd say the 32GB model is probably a reasonable pick, but if you want to store a lot of music on your iPad you can certainly make a case for the 64GB model.

The price ends up being right up there with many budget laptops, but the A7 SoC actually manages to compete with basic Windows laptops. Add in a keyboard – I've seen quite a few options, but I'd be inclined to go with the Official Keyboard and Incase Origami or one of the many third-party Bluetooth keyboard and case options. With a keyboard, the iPad Air becomes a viable laptop replacement. I'm still going to turn to Windows laptops for my serious work like writing articles and editing images, but with a keyboard I can do about 95% of my work on a tablet and not feel like I'm missing much. Another generation or two (and perhaps some additional price cuts) and the budget laptop segment is going to be in serious jeopardy.

I'll be honest here: I'm not devoted to the Apple ecosystem by any stretch of the imagination, but mostly that's because I tend to gravitate more towards the affordable end of the spectrum. That said, if money were no object, I'd go out and buy the iPad Air 32GB or maybe even 64GB. In my opinion, the combination of SoC, industrial design, display, performance, and other features makes it the best current tablet on the market. That's not to say that I don't like Android options, but as someone that has never actually owned an Apple product other than a 4th Generation iPod Touch, I still envy those that apparently can afford the latest and greatest Apple smartphones and tablets.

Android Tablets

When we shift over the the Android market, things get far more diverse in terms of hardware, performance, pricing, quality, etc. Many if not most Android tablets feel very much like budget offerings, though not all of them are priced accordingly. There's also an issue with getting updated versions of Android for these tablets; I have an old Tegra 2 Acer A500 that never got updated beyond Android 4.0.3 (which took six months, never mind the display failing when the tablet was less than two years old), while a newer Tegra 3 Acer A700 stopped at Android 4.0.4. And such behavior is not at all limited to Acer – another “no-name” tablet that I have is also stuck on Android 4.0.4, and even the Google Nexus devices stop getting updated beyond a certain point. Part of this comes from trying to support a wider array of hardware, but regardless it still happens. Contrast that with iOS where devices tend to receive the latest OS updates until they reach the point where they're too slow (e.g. my iPod Touch 4th Gen is still on iOS 6.x); if you like getting more than six months of OS updates, Android isn't necessarily the best option.

With that said, there are a ton of Android tablets out there, with options that cater to your preference for saving money or getting a fast and recent tablet, along with size considerations as well. If all you want is a budget tablet that can browse the web and run some other apps, I'd look at the less expensive devices and be done with it. Dell sent over their Venue 8 tablet for review, and with a base price of $180 for 16GB storage and 2GB RAM with a Clover Trail Z2580 Atom SoC, it's not a bad tablet. The Venue 7 is similar but slightly smaller, with an Atom Z2560 but still with 2GB RAM and 16GB storage, starting at just $150.

Neither Dell Venue will set the world on fire in terms of performance or features, but the Atom SoC is generally much better than what you'll find in other $150-$200 tablets (i.e. the MediaTek SoCs in the ASUS MeMO Pad HD 7). On the Venue 8, Octane V1 performance for example is 3536 (in Chrome), Kraken 1.1 is 10,503, and 3DMark gives the following scores: Ice Storm 8310, Graphics 7915, and Physics 10066. You'll see that based off those results, the Venue 8 is right near the top of our Android CPU charts while the GPU is more in line with last year's hardware. Again, for the price the Venue 7 and 8 are reasonable options – and you still get a microSD slot capable of taking up to 32GB cards.

Step up the pricing scale a bit and we come to the one Android tablet that we can recommend without any reservations: the Nexus 7 (2013). Priced at $229 for 16GB and $269 for 32GB, it's a decent bump in price over the Venue 7 and 8, but it has a faster GPU (by about 30%) and a much nicer 1920x1200 LCD. You can read more about the Nexus 7 in our full review, but really the only complaint I can raise is the lack of a microSD slot. (Google can say it's difficult and confusing or whatever, but I use a 32GB microSD card and have no issues with it on another tablet.)

Having covered the smaller Android devices, all that's left is to pick a good 9-10” Android tablet. We actually talked about this the other day, and to be honest there's no single Android tablet where we can universally recommend it. The Nexus 10 is probably the closest we can come, but even that has some issues and it's certainly due for an update. (Performance is basically similar to the Venue 8 it seems, which costs half as much as the Nexus 10). Pricing is also a tough spot, with the 16GB model going for $399 and the 32GB model going for $499 – not quite as bad as Apple's iPad Air, but then it's also not as good as the iPad Air (IMO). The good news with Nexus devices is that at least you'll get a reasonable number of OS updates – both the Nexus 7 and 10 now have Android 4.4 (KitKat) factory images available.

If you're just after a 10” Android tablet that won't break the bank, there are plenty to choose from, but nothing else really stands out enough to warrant an explicit recommendation. Figure out your price range and then look at the options and see what you can come up with. Then go search for some reviews and try to decide if there are any deal breakers – and getting some hands-on time with your potential purchase is always nice.

And as a final comment on the Android side of things, while I understand the idea behind the Kindle Fire HDX, the lack of Google Services (Google Play) basically kills that for me. It's not a bad tablet, but it would be much better in my book if it had the full set of Android software.

Windows Tablets?

If coming up with some solid recommendations for Android tablets was tricky, doing so for Windows is even more so. Again, we discussed this among the AnandTech editors and not a single one of us was really gung ho on Windows RT tablets. Windows RT is basically a cut down version of Windows 8.1 that's not worth the time or money unless all you want is something to run Internet Explorer and Office (this was Brian's take on what he does with his Surface 2). Note also that you need bare minimum 32GB on a Windows tablet (half of which gets eaten by the OS), so while the Windows devices start with twice the storage, you're really getting about the same usable amount of storage.

Considering the prices on good Android tablets, it's really a tough sell right now convincing anyone to spend $450 on a Surface 2. If you want MS Office on a tablet, great, but there are less expensive options. Perhaps you're one of those that likes WinRT, though, and you're welcome to it. Even the original Microsoft Surface is still going for close to $300, though, so unless you can find a much lower price I'm inclined to look for other options. Specifically, let's look at a full Windows 8.1 tablet....

Dell shows up again, this time with the Venue Pro 8 – available with 32GB for $250 or 64GB for $312. Considering you get a full copy of Windows 8.1, the price is pretty amazing; you also get Intel's new Bay Trail platform with Atom Z3740D, which should actually run quite well – I'd love to get the chip in an Android tablet, incidentally (for closer to $200). The 2GB RAM may present some problems if you try and do anything too crazy, but desktop mode on an 8” 1280x800 display isn't the primary draw I suspect, and the Modern apps should work okay with the limited amount of RAM.

The other Windows tablet we could really agree was worth getting is the Microsoft Surface Pro 2, but that's almost more of a laptop that's missing a keyboard than it is a tablet – and it's priced accordingly. (Add the keyboard and it really is a laptop replacement.) Don't get me wrong: the Surface Pro 2 has a lot going for it, but when I think of tablets I'm rarely even considering a $900 device. There are people that really love the Surface Pro, and the Surface Pro 2 ups the ante with improved battery life courtesy of the Haswell CPU. It's a tablet that can actually be used for productivity, thanks to the ability to run all the standard Windows applications. If you want a good Windows 8.1 tablet, this is currently the best option, but while it has some clear advantages over an iPad Air, pricing isn't really one of them.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • jimbo2779 - Friday, December 20, 2013 - link

    Every time I read a tablet review on here and other websites there is this same spam from tabletsprint.
  • ESC2000 - Thursday, January 2, 2014 - link

    +1. Even if reviewers don't recognize the awesomeness of windows tablets (although AT praised the T100), consumers will demonstrate their awesomeness with their dollars. What could be better than a device that can be used for play and for work or school, especially if said device includes free office and costs $200-350?

    I'm in love with my dell venue pro 8 - windows 8, free office, 8" and less than a pound, nice design, stylus, came with $25 credit to the windows store, all for $200 (I got it on sale - $300 normally). I use it for play but I can also use it to log into my VPN and remote desktop to do work and to draft and edit documents using word, excel and power point, which are the programs my firm uses. Using whatever word substitutes ios and android offer is out of the question bc formatting is crucial in my field, and only office offers a full panoply of formatting options, not to mention the disaster that would result from trying to cut and paste from other word processing programs. Office also offers endless features that we use (including some features specially designed for my firm like the ability to toggle between straight quotes and curly ones). I am getting astray from my point, which is that having an ultraportable tablet that I carry everywhere that I can use for work without the limitations of ios android is amazing. I only wish it had a higher rez screen and that the stylus functioned better.

    Anyway I think windows 8 tablets, and to nearly the same extent windows rt tablets, are going to be popular successes even if they are not critically acclaimed.
  • sri_tech - Thursday, December 19, 2013 - link

    "Windows RT is basically not worth the time or money unless all you want is something to run Internet Explorer"

    Really? Why are you dismissing RT without saying the disadvantages? You are acting like Windows RT does not have any apps.

    Its sad that anandtech is saying like this. But you guys never dismissed chromebooks which require almost everything to be done in the browser.

    Windows RT has official facebook and twitter apps while android apps are not optimized for tablets, especially large screen ones.

    I understand bloggers taking sides of beloved platforms but I thought anandtech is different :(
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, December 19, 2013 - link

    My point is that while there are apps for WinRT, there are not nearly as many as on Android. Would you pay minimum $250 ($50 more than the Venue 8 32GB) to get a tablet that basically doesn't have nearly as many apps? Maybe in a year, WinRT will be better... except we said that a year ago and it still isn't. It's not about "taking sides" -- I'm just saying that as far as tablets go right now, speaking of the best options, I wouldn't recommend anything with WinRT. Besides, Win8.1 tablets are basically the same price in many cases. The market is speaking, and right now it's saying, "We don't want WinRT -- full Win8.1 or nothing, thanks!"
  • Liam F. O'Neill - Thursday, December 19, 2013 - link

    Jarred, I am sorry but I have to chime in here.

    First of all Windows RT has Office. You talked about the iPad being a possible laptop replacement in a generation or two. Right now devices like the Surface 2 are, for most users.

    Secondly, Windows RT has many first party apps you would come to expect on a tablet. You say that after a year Windows RT isn't better, yet apps like Facebook and Flipboard have been released in that year, not to mention 8.1 which was a substantial upgrade. I own both an iPad and a Surface 2 and honestly the Surface 2 is the device I bring with me as it is just a much more capable device.

    I take your point that if Windows RT and full Windows 8.1 are the same price then why would someone choose RT, then of course choose the more full featured version. But give RT a fair shout, instead of blindly dismissing it. You obviously haven't used in on a regular basis like I have, otherwise I doubt you would be as dismissive. Give it a try my friend.
  • kwrzesien - Thursday, December 19, 2013 - link

    I think we should really distinguish between "consumption" tablets and "productivity" tablets, they are two entirely different markets even if the final form factors look similar. Windows 8 tablets are productivity devices, need double or quadruple the cpu, ram, nand and other specs (other than screen) and are double the price - especially when extras are included. And that's okay, because its justified. But you know when you need one of these and you buy it for the work you do.

    Consumption tablets are computing appliances. They should be easy to hand around (to the kids, wife, etc.), just work, not have any disk system, update super easy, and have a very long battery life even when used continuously. It's something I don't have to support, and can buy for anyone. For this market iOS is by far the best, and Android has some reasonable products but I wouldn't touch Windows.
  • laytoncy - Thursday, December 19, 2013 - link

    I completely agree. The Surface Pro 2 is meant for productivity. You could not have said it better and this is coming from someone that has 2 iPad's and the Nexus 7. But I've finally realized that at this point I need a device that I can be more productive with and that for me is a Windows 8 tablet.
  • sprockkets - Thursday, December 19, 2013 - link

    "First of all Windows RT has Office. You talked about the iPad being a possible laptop replacement in a generation or two. Right now devices like the Surface 2 are, for most users."

    Win 8.1 is shipping with office now.
  • End User - Thursday, December 19, 2013 - link

    Whether it is processing emails, composing docs/presentations/spreadsheets, projecting presentations, remote management of workstations/servers, browsing file servers, VOIP calls or a myriad of other productive task my iPad Air steps up to the plate. The same goes for Android tablets. You are kidding yourself by thinking Windows is the only productivity platform.
  • End User - Thursday, December 19, 2013 - link

    Hmmm, that should have been a reply to kwrzesien.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now