Each year, Google picks a silicon vendor, a hardware partner, and releases a new version of Android running on top of them. The result is a Nexus phone, and for five iterations now that process has repeated, resulting in a smartphone that’s the purest expression of Google’s vision for its mobile platform. Today we’re looking at the Nexus 5.

Nexus 5, as its name makes obvious, is the latest generation of Google’s line of Nexus smartphones, and also is topped by a 5-inch display. While the Nexus program originally started only for smartphones, we’ve seen Google since extend the program to include a 7-inch and 10-inch tablet form factor, as well as a line of accessories. In recent years, we’ve seen Nexus go from being part enthusiast curiosity and development device, to a brand tailored for consumers looking for the latest and greatest the Android platform has to offer at a killer price.

Last generation we saw the Nexus 4, a device that was essentially an LG Optimus G for T-Mobile in different clothing and priced at a competitive price, yet still included the latest and greatest silicon from Qualcomm with APQ8064 (S4 Pro). For Nexus 5, Google has once again gone with hardware partner LG and silicon vendor Qualcomm, this time with a phone that’s somewhat analogous to the LG G2 (but not exactly the same platform) and using the latest and greatest MSM8974 (Snapdragon 800) silicon.

Let’s start with the hardware, since that’s the normal flow for a review. The Nexus 4 bore a lot of superficial similarities to the Optimus G, including a glass back with laser etched design below its surface, the same display, banding, and materials. The Nexus 5 on the other hand doesn’t bear any similarities to the G2, with its buttons on the back, narrow bezel, rounded backside, and glossy plastic. Instead, the Nexus 5’s design borrows much of its industrial design language from the Nexus 7 (2013), with the slightly rounded top and bottom, landscape “nexus” logo on the rear, and large radius curves all around the side. The Nexus 5 and 7 share almost the same shape and profile, and in the case of the black Nexus 5, same rubberized soft touch material on the back and sides. If you scaled down the Nexus 7 design you’d get something which is awfully close to the Nexus 5.

The result is a two-device family that feels like it was made by the same company, and it’s really the first time Google has aligned its industrial design in such a sweeping fashion, in this case even across two different hardware partners. I guess you could make the argument that with the exception of the Nexus 10, Google has eliminated any industrial design fragmentation and finally crafted some hardware design language that it owns for itself.

Google sampled us first a black Nexus 5, and later a white Nexus 5 at my request so I could check out the material differences I saw some discussion about. It’s true that there are some differences between the two devices. For starters, the white device has a backside which eschews the soft touch material, instead giving the polymer-backed device a rougher, textured feeling. The absence of soft touch continues to the edge, which is glossy black plastic instead of the rubberized material, and comes with protective plastic installed over it by default. On the front the only visible difference between white and black is a white colored earpiece, the rest of the bezel around the display is still black.

I’m reminded of the split between the white and black Note 3 with the Nexus 5, which also only includes rubberized material on the black model. I find myself preferring the feeling of the white model instead, but it’s really just a story of personal taste. No doubt the absence of soft touch on the white material is to prevent staining from hand oils or other dyes as the device ages. I don’t find that the absence of soft touch on the white model makes it any more difficult to hold or grip onto, the negative-angled bezel really does help the Nexus 5 fit into the hand securely.

Although the Nexus 5 is a close cousin, it doesn’t adopt the button arrangement from the G2, instead locating the volume and standby buttons in a normal place. Volume rocker ends up on the left, power on the right side.

Likewise earpiece is on top and microUSB is at the bottom of the device. What’s unique about the Nexus 5 buttons is the material of those buttons – they’re ceramic, not polycarbonate. The result is that they’re sharp and instantly locatable with the brush of a finger, it’s a subtle thing that does feel different. The only complaint I have is that they do seem to rattle slightly inside their cutouts. I can affirm that the white model seems to have less rattle, but I’m not entirely sure how much of that is intrinsic to the color difference and absence of soft touch.

Also on the back is the Nexus 5’s oversized camera cutout, which is slightly raised from the surface around it. It’s fair to say that the Nexus 5 does have a camera bump, something that’s not going away soon in all but the most iconic devices. When I first saw the oversized ring, I assumed it was just a design motif, and others later speculated it was for a line of magnetically-attachable add on lenses. To date none of those have materialized, and upon further consideration having magnets next to the VCM (voice coil motor) electromagnetic focus and OIS mechanism could complicate things. In any case, at present the oversized ring around the camera aperture is a unique design point rather than something which serves a function.

The only real negative about the camera cutout is that dust seems to be able to get into the crack surrounding it and the cover glass. It’s something unfortunate about the Nexus 5’s design in general – there are cracks that show dirt quickly, for example the backside has a seam around the edge where dust seems to intrude. It obviously doesn’t change the Nexus 5’s function, but immediately starts looking dirty on the black model, and part of why given both side by side I prefer the white one.

I think pragmatic describes the Nexus 5 design quite well, since honestly the design doesn’t try to be flashy just for the sake of differentiation or make any crazy materials choices on the outside. There are subtle design features which definitely are appreciated, however, like the negative angle to the edge which makes the device easy to grip, those ceramic buttons, and the continuity of design language from the Nexus 7 of course. Materials are a big differentiator between devices right now, and again the Nexus 5 is relatively pragmatic with its choice of polymer, but does deserve kudos for not going with the slick, glossy-surfaced material still preferred by Korean handset makers.

The Nexus 5 feels well made and precision crafted, but I can’t shake the feeling that Nexus 4 felt more like a standout design of its own. The Nexus 5 seems a lot more, well, traditional, without the rounded-glass edges, chrome ring, or pattern below the glass on the back (which I still maintain contained some kind of encoded message). The reality is that Google made a lot of decisions with Nexus to optimize for cost, and that the Nexus 5’s design is actually quite differentiated given the price.

The Nexus 5 adds a lot over its predecessor – larger 1080p display, newer silicon, 802.11ac, better camera with OIS, and of course LTE connectivity, all while getting minimally more expensive than its predecessor. It’s almost unnecessary to say that the Nexus 5 is obviously the best Nexus phone yet.

Physical Comparison
  LG G2 Samsung Galaxy Nexus (GSM/UMTS) LG Nexus 4 LG Nexus 5
Height 138.5 mm 135.5 mm 133.9 mm 137.84 mm
Width 70.9 mm 67.94 mm 68.7 mm 69.17 mm
Depth 9.14 mm 8.94 mm 9.1 mm 8.59 mm
Weight 143 g 135 g 139 g 130 g
CPU 2.26 GHz MSM8974
(Quad Core Krait 400)
1.2 GHz OMAP 4460 (Dual Core Cortex A9) 1.5 GHz APQ8064 (Quad Core Krait) 2.26 GHz MSM8974
(Quad Core Krait 400)
GPU Adreno 330 PowerVR SGX 540 @ 304 MHz Adreno 320 Adreno 330
NAND 16/32 GB NAND 16/32 GB NAND 8/16 GB NAND 16/32 GB NAND
Camera 13 MP with OIS and Flash (Rear Facing) 2.1 MP Full HD (Front Facing) 5 MP with AF/LED Flash, 1080p30 video recording, 1.3 MP front facing 8 MP with AF/LED Flash, 1.3 MP front facing 8 MP with OIS, AF, LED flash, 1.3 MP front facing
Screen 5.2-inch 1920x1080 Full HD IPS LCD 4.65" 1280x720 SAMOLED HD 4.7" 1280x768 HD IPS+ LCD 4.95" 1920x1080 HD IPS LCD
Battery Internal 11.4 Whr Removable 6.48 Whr Internal 8.0 Whr Internal 8.74 Whr

Google also sent over one of the Nexus 5 bumper cases, which really isn’t so much bumper as it is, well, all around case. The Nexus 4 had bumpers that wrapped around the edge, but left the glass back exposed, much like the iPhone 4/4S era bumpers.

Nexus 5’s bumper case covers up everything but the oversized camera aperture on the back. The red one I got doesn’t seem to be silicone but some other thermoplastic.

At $35 it’s a bit on the pricey side, but it does fit the device nicely and get the job done with some cool neon colors that spice up the Nexus 5.

Android 4.4 KitKat and ART
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • edlee - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    yeah, I reread that sentence three times to fully understand what he was trying to say, it needs a rewrite.
  • hrrmph - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    Just swap the words "substitute good" to "good substitute."

    He is clearly saying that Android and iOS are more or less on par with each other, with neither OS having a compelling advantage over the other.

    It now seems more important to read the details of the articles with regards to the specific functions of each of the operating systems.

    The iOS camera software is superior at this point, and a weak point of the Android OS, if that is important to you.

    As I have recently come to understand (having used Apple iOS, Android 4.3, Blackberry OS 10, and WinPhone8), there is no OS that consolidates all emails, SMS, call data, and notifications in one easy-to-read list as good as BB OS10 does. A real time saver. But, you get a crappy camera.

    So the Nexus 5 gets good camera hardware and crappy Android camera software. Hopefully there is a fix on the way soon.

    If you want a read-out of "true" North on the compass, then iOS will easily do that, but BB-OS10 won't.

    WinPhone 8 won't read FLAC audio files.

    BB OS10 won't let you format the Micro-SDXC storage card using the exFAT file system. Android will.

    We are now in the days where there is finally a very close neck and neck competition amongst the mobile OSes for the best quality and functionality. Unfortunately, all of the OSes have some basic features missing. They all have some catching up to do to get it right.
  • Galcobar - Friday, December 6, 2013 - link

    The sentence is correctly written.

    "A good" means an item with value (as opposed to a bad such as pollution which has negative value). Most people encounter the word in the form of "goods and services."

    "Substitute good" is a standard English term, meaning a good which is an adequate replacement for another good.
  • Pr3ch34r - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    I'm going to iOS, tired of beta Android versions ever since 4.0, that and the 18 month since device announced update policy...
  • Alpeshkh - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link


    Still reading the battery life section and. gotta say, "Great things do take time"!

    Seriously, battery life numbers are clearly the biggest surprise. Who would've thought that N5 would beat iPhone 5s in some battery life tests!? All, 'Tech' blogs who rushed out for reviews & giving scores for getting clicks should really consider their reviews' process & use the device as their daily driver for considerable amount of time!

    As for me, I was just waiting for Brian's review & his finding on battery life & am really happy to see the results!

    @Brian, for the difference between G2 & N5 in battery life, could the PSR be the reason!? Just curious!

    Thanks for the quality review as always! It was totally worth the wait! Really appreciate the effort you and whole of AnandTech people put in!
  • danbob999 - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    Most "tech" sites just looked at the number of mAh and concluded that it must suck given that it's smaller than the G2's.
    I call them "tech" sites because they are becoming more like fashion magazines, putting the emphasis on how they feel about the product.
  • yankeeDDL - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    Best Nexus5 review, by far. Thanks.
    I whitelisted anandtech on adblock because of this review: you guys really deserve it.
    I bought a Nexus5 and I read many of these reviews before doing so, but I confess that I hesitated a bit. Now I am (even more) convinced I made a good purchase.
  • Pr3ch34r - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    so AT approved your buy thus you give them back, how about, for a change, ack that AT is a great site for every device, apple included, can you write that?
  • Paulman - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    Maybe it's because AT validated what he/she now already knows based on firsthand experience, while the other tech sites proved to err more on the side of naysaying?

    I don't know if the comment author has received their phone yet, but of they're like me, what I found was that a lot of the review sites blast the Nexus 5 on "poor battery life" and a "lousy camera", when in fact I've found battery life to be quite good, easily lasting a day out (in fact, on my light usage, it goes 24 hours+) and even while I take pretty good quality photos in all sorts of light (just that the camera UI is kind of messed up [slow and a bit buggy]). Also, the overall feel and responsiveness of the device "feels" really nice :)
  • yankeeDDL - Friday, December 6, 2013 - link

    Hey, this was a great review, and, in general, I enjoy AT. I don't believe all reviews are as stellar as this one, although they're all definitely good. How can you manipulate someone's positive comment to the point of making it sound as a negative thing? Dude, chill.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now