Power Consumption

There's a lot of uncertainty around whether or not Kepler is suitable for ultra low power operation, especially given that we've only seen it in relatively high TDP (compared to tablets/smartphones) PCs. NVIDIA hoped to put those concerns to rest with a quick GLBenchmark 2.7 demo at Siggraph. The demo pitted an iPad 4 against a Logan development platform, with Logan's Kepler GPU clocked low enough to equal the performance of the iPad 4. The low clock speed does put Kepler at an advantage as it can run at a lower voltage as well, so the comparison is definitely one you'd expect NVIDIA to win. 

Unlike Tegra 3, Logan includes a single voltage rail that feeds just the GPU. NVIDIA instrumented this voltage rail and measured power consumption while running the offscreen 1080p T-Rex HD test in GLB2.7. Isolating GPU power alone, NVIDIA measured around 900mW for Logan's Kepler implementation running at iPad 4 performance levels (potentially as little as 1/5 of Logan's peak performance). NVIDIA also attempted to find and isolate the GPU power rail going into Apple's A6X (using a similar approach to what we documented here), and came up with an average GPU power value of around 2.6W. 

I won't focus too much on the GPU power comparison as I don't know what else (if anything) Apple hangs off of its GPU power rail, but the most important takeaway here is that Kepler seems capable of scaling down to below 1W. In reality NVIDIA wouldn't ship Logan with a < 1W Kepler implementation, so we'll likely see higher performance (and power consumption) in shipping devices. If these numbers are believable, you could see roughly 2x the performance of an iPad 4 in a Logan based smartphone, and 4 - 5x the performance of an iPad 4 in a Logan tablet - in as little as 12 months from now if NVIDIA can ship this thing on time.

If NVIDIA's A6X power comparison is truly apples-to-apples, then it would be a huge testament to the power efficiency of NVIDIA's mobile Kepler architecture. Given the recent announcement of NVIDIA's willingness to license Kepler IP to any company who wants it, this demo seems very well planned. 

NVIDIA did some work to make Kepler suitable for low power, but it's my understanding that the underlying architecture isn't vastly different from what we have in notebooks and desktops today. Mobile Kepler retains all of the graphics features as its bigger counterparts, although I'm guessing things like FP64 CUDA cores are gone.

Final Words

For the past couple of years we've been talking about a point in the future when it'll be possible to start playing console class games (Xbox 360/PS3) on mobile devices. We're almost there. The move to Kepler with Logan is a big deal for NVIDIA. It finally modernizes NVIDIA's ultra mobile GPU, bringing graphics API partity to everything from smartphones to high-end desktop PCs. This is a huge step for game developers looking to target multiple platforms. It's also a big deal for mobile OS vendors and device makers looking to capitalize on gaming as a way of encouraging future smartphone and tablet upgrades. As smartphone and tablet upgrade cycles slow down, pushing high-end gaming to customers will become a more attractive option for device makers.

Logan is expected to ship in the first half of 2014. With early silicon back now, I think 10 - 12 months from now is a reasonable estimate. There is the unavoidable fact that we haven't even seen Tegra 4 devices on the market yet and NVIDIA is already talking about Logan. Everything I've heard points to Tegra 4 being on the schedule for a bunch of device wins, but delays on NVIDIA's part forced it to be designed out. Other than drumming up IP licensing business, I wonder if that's another reason why we're seeing a very public demo of Logan now - to show the health of early silicon. There's also a concern about process node. Logan will likely ship at 28nm next year, just before the transition to 20nm. If NVIDIA is late with Logan, we could have another Tegra 3 situation where NVIDIA is shipping on an older process technology.

Regardless of process tech however, Kepler's power story in ultra mobile seems great. I really didn't believe the GLBenchmark data when I first saw it. I showed it to Ryan Smith, our Senior GPU Editor, and even he didn't believe it. If NVIDIA is indeed able to get iPad 4 levels of graphics performance at less than 1W (and presumably much more performance in the 2.5 - 5W range) it looks like Kepler will do extremely well in mobile.

Whatever NVIDIA's reasons for showing off Logan now, the result is something that I'm very excited about. A mobile SoC with NVIDIA's latest GPU architecture is exactly what we've been waiting for. 

Introduction
POST A COMMENT

141 Comments

View All Comments

  • Refuge - Thursday, July 25, 2013 - link

    I can't possibly see WP8.x running DX, unless you are referring to the surface pro.

    I mean the option is there, but lone API's don't get developer attention, unless my limited knowledge is misleading me, that would make porting things to WP from iOS/Android more work than it could possibly be worth.

    Much the same as the Cell processor in PS3, never got used fully because it was a bear to code for.
    Reply
  • Stuka87 - Wednesday, July 24, 2013 - link

    Arg, anytime I read "Performance Data" from nVidia about an unreleased product my head hurts. Reply
  • Voldenuit - Wednesday, July 24, 2013 - link

    It's... the best at what it does?

    SNIKT!
    Reply
  • jjj - Wednesday, July 24, 2013 - link

    "we haven't even seen Tegra 4 devices on the market yet"

    The Toshiba tablets have been in stores for a while now.
    Reply
  • Devfarce - Wednesday, July 24, 2013 - link

    They compare it to iPad but this could very well be in the next iPad down the road. Not as Logan but as licensed IP. Apple could have licensed this a year ago and the world wouldnt have been any wiser with NDAs desipite the recent announcement. They build their own chips and license PowerVR IP. There isn't much stopping them from soliciting other vendors other than inertia behind an established partner/codebase and existing contracts. Reply
  • Stuka87 - Wednesday, July 24, 2013 - link

    Except the next PowerVR which will be shipping any time now will already match Logan (From the looks of things at least). Reply
  • Scannall - Wednesday, July 24, 2013 - link

    Plus they own a good sized chunk of PowerVR. Reply
  • Eric S - Wednesday, July 24, 2013 - link

    It would make sense. Apple is more invested (and ahead of the game) in their CPU tech. They may license a graphics chip if it is good enough. For that matter they may be able to license Intel graphics tech. People criticize it, but it may actually perform well for the tablet space where there is no dedicated memory. Reply
  • michael2k - Thursday, July 25, 2013 - link

    No, it doesn't make sense. They currently license PowerVR, which is ahead of NVIDIA. The PowerVR 6, which is the same performance level as Logan/Kepler, was available for license last January, and should be shipping in product this year. Reply
  • Krysto - Wednesday, July 24, 2013 - link

    And you thought Atom stands a chance against ARM chips Anand? Even Bay Trail (tablet-only chip) has like HALF the GPU performance of Tegra 4...And Merrifield will be completely embarrassed by 20nm ARM chips in 2014 (which presumably includes Tegra 5, too). Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now