Display Measurement

The display of the Mi 11 is a highlight of the device. A 1440p, 120Hz AMOLED panel is a major step-up in Xiaomi’s device line-up, and is a definitive improvement over past year implementations in the mainline Mi series.

The panel is of a similar generation we’ve seen in last year’s Galaxy S20 series as well as on the OnePlus 8 Pro – more similar to the latter unit as Xiaomi allows 1440p at 120Hz simultaneously. What’s lacking for the device, is any kind of variable refresh rate mechanism, no software based coarse VRR as on the base S21 series, neither a more advanced hardware one as on the S21 Ultra.

Edit March 12th: The Mi 11 does have a coarse software-based refresh rate switching mechanism, however it does not function below 110 nits screen brightness (around 70% on the brightness slider). 

In terms of screen calibration and controls, Xiaomi gets top marks here as the company offers various different default operating modes which offer fine-tuning of the colour temperature, as well as offering an advanced fully custom mode where you can fully control the screen calibration from hue, saturations and even gamma controls. Generally speaking, you are able to set up the display of the Mi 11 however you like it the most, and I applaud such levels of customisation.

What we’re testing today is the “Original colour” mode at its default settings, which is supposed to be a calibrated target to sRGB and P3 standards.

We move on to the display calibration and fundamental display measurements of the Xiaomi Mi 11 screen. As always, we thank X-Rite and SpecraCal, as our measurements are performed with an X-Rite i1Pro 2 spectrophotometer, with the exception of black levels which are measured with an i1Display Pro colorimeter. Data is collected and examined using Portrait Display's CalMAN software.

Display Measurement - Maximum Brightness

In terms of brightness, the Mi 11 is a top performer. At 850 nits peak full screen white brightness when in auto-brightness and under brightly lit ambient light, the screen only falls behind the newer S21 Ultra which has a superior emitter technology. Under manual brightness, the phone lands in at 487 nits, which is in line with what we’ve seen in the Mi 10 Pro last year.

Portrait Displays CalMAN

In the greyscale performance, the Mi 11 is quite a bit off the mark in two aspects. First of all, the reds are quite dominant as average colour temperature lands in at 6314K, and whites land in also reddish at 6241K, below an ideal 6505K target for pure daylight white. This gives the Mi 11 a colour dETIP of 2.19.

The more offending discrepancy however is in the gamma, where the Mi 11 apparently targets a 2.3 figure, measuring in at 2.31 average. This is higher than a typical 2.2 calibration, and it means that tones will appear slightly darker than they should be, possibly giving content a little more contrast than what they’re meant to be displayed at. This regresses the overall dEITP to 5.45.

Portrait Displays CalMAN

In the saturations, we’re seeing generally good performance in most colours except for the reds and the magentas, which are oversaturated and too dominant, again similar to the too warm colour temperature in the greyscale values.

Portrait Displays CalMAN

Finally, in the GretagMacbeth patches of commonly found tones such as skin tones, the Mi 11 does averagely. It’s not a total disaster, but we’re seeing the too dark luminance due to the higher gamma, as well as oversaturation in the reds. Both aspects end up with the Mi 11 getting an dEITP of only 5.04.

Generally, the screen of the Mi 11 is still excellent when it comes to its fundamentals – fantastic brightness, contrast, resolution and of course that 120Hz refresh rate. The colour calibration isn’t the best, but it’s still adequate enough, and at least Xiaomi gives you extensive controls to adjust the screen to your liking. At least at this price point, the Mi 11 is able to compete extremely well with just the fundamental characteristics of the display, even if it’s not the most advanced or accurate panel out there.

GPU Performance Battery Life - The Bad News


View All Comments

  • inighthawki - Thursday, March 18, 2021 - link

    What a well thought out reply. Thanks. Reply
  • zamroni - Wednesday, March 17, 2021 - link

    I still use galaxy s9 as my current phone.
    Curved edge screen sucks.
    It also less durable.
    My screen replacement also costed ~$100 more than flat s10e
  • Wereweeb - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    Preach, brother. Reply
  • Hifihedgehog - Sunday, March 14, 2021 - link

    Curved edges: Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should. Reply
  • Findecanor - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    Curved edge means more likely to break if dropped Reply
  • ballsystemlord - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    Shouldn't it be less likely because of the force vectors involved? Reply
  • RSAUser - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    No due to how the glass is folded, force distribution is worse. Also getting cases that work well is more difficult. Reply
  • Spunjji - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    In theory, but the main problem is the total inability to fit a full-coverage screen protector. Reply
  • Unashamed_unoriginal_username_x86 - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    X-T30 83mm photo seems to give a 404 on the first pic in the HDR section (green bike) Reply
  • 5j3rul3 - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    Is Mi 11 using it LTPO OLED? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now