MediaTek Announces Dimensity 1000 SoC: Back To The High-End With 5G
by Andrei Frumusanu on November 26, 2019 12:30 AM EST- Posted in
- Mobile
- Smartphones
- SoCs
- MediaTek
- 5G
- Cortex A77
- Mali-G77
- Dimensity 1000
Today MediaTek is announcing the new Dimensity 1000 SoC – the company’s new 5G flagship SoC for 2019 and early 2020. The announcement really isn’t too much of a surprising new reveal, as the “5G SoC” was announced some time ago in May with the company describing its 5G capabilities as well as the inclusion of the new Cortex-A77 and Mali-G77 IPs. What MediaTek does today however is to officially name the new chipset, and go into a few more details on the specifications.
First of all, the naming of the chipset is part of rebrand for the company’s SoC line-up going forward. The “Dimensity” name is meant to usher in a new generation and differentiate the new 5G SoC from the previous 4G Helio line-up.
“We chose the name Dimensity to highlight how our 5G solutions are driving new waves of innovation and experiences, much like the fabled fifth dimension,”
- MediaTek President Joe Chen.
MediaTek SoCs | ||
SoC | Dimensity 1000 | Helio G90 (Helio G90T) |
CPU | 4x Cortex A77 @ 2.6GHz 4x Cortex A55 @ 2.0GHz |
2x Cortex A76 @ 2.0GHz (2.05GHz) 6x Cortex A55 @ 2.0GHz |
GPU | Mali-G77MP9 @ ? MHz | Mali G76 MP4 @ 720MHz (800MHz) |
APU / NPU / AI Proc. / Neural IP | "3rd gen APU" 2 "big" + 3 "small" + 1 "tiny" 4.5TOPs total perf |
2x APU +1TOPs total perf |
Memory | 4x 16b LPDDR4x | LPDDR4X @ 2133MHz |
ISP/Camera | 80MP or 32MP + 16MP |
1x 48MP (64MP) or 2x 24+16MP |
Encode/ Decode |
2160p60 H.264 & HEVC & AV1 (Decode) |
2160p30 H.264 & HEVC |
Integrated Modem | 5G Sub-6 DL = 4600Mbps 200MHz 2CA, 256-QAM, 4x4 MIMO UL = 2500Mbps 200MHz 2CA, 256-QAM, 2x2 MIMO LTE Category 19 DL |
Category 12/13 DL = 600Mbps 3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM, 4x4 MIMO UL = 150Mbps 2x20MHz CA,64-QAM |
Connectivity | WiFi 6 (802.11ax) + Bluetooth 5.1 + Dual Band GNSS |
|
Mfc. Process | N7 | 12FFC |
At the heart of the Dimensity SoC lies the new Cortex-A77 CPU. MediaTek was notoriously first to announce a product based on the new IP, only days after Arm had themselves publicly revealed the new microarchitecture. Today MediaTek goes into more detail, and explains that the CPU configuration on the Dimensity 1000 (Let’s just call it the D1000) is a 4x Cortex-A77 setup running at 2.6GHz alongside 4x Cortex-A55’s at 2.0GHz. The 2.6GHz clock rate is pretty much spot on where we expected the first A77 configuration to land at, and should make the D1000 extremely competitive on the high-end of the SoC market.
The fact that this is a SoC with 4 big cores further enforces the notion that this is a flagship chip, and is a departure from MediaTek’s CPU strategy of the previous few years. The SoC also employs a new Mali-G77 GPU in an MP9 configuration. This setup is 19% smaller than the MP11 in the Exynos 990, but MediaTek also doesn't disclose any clock frequency, so the end performance likely isn't fully determined yet. Nevertheless, it's a very competitive GPU configuration.
The chip continues to support LPDDR4 - so while we'll see LP5 from the competition, it still makes sense for MediaTek to use LP4 this generation.
MediaTek also employs its own third-generation neural processing unit which it calls “APU 3.0”. It says it’s able to double the performance over its previous generation chipsets. MediaTek fared quite well in some benchmarks here due to its quite complete software stack supporting all the new NNAPI features, whilst other vendors such as Qualcomm or Samsung still have incomplete solutions.
ISP capabilities have been improved and the new SoC will support camera sensors with resolutions of up to 80MP at 24fps, or multi-camera setups with 32+16MP sensors. Media encoding capabilities fall in at 4K60, but here the biggest surprise lies in the chipset's support for AV1 video decoding. As far as we're aware, this make the D1000 the very first consumer mobile SoC to support the format, which is a great leap forward in terms of future-proofing the devices which are based on the new chip.
Most importantly what justifies the Dimensity 1000 adopting a whole new branding is the fact that it’s a 5G with a new integrated modem. MediaTek discloses it supports 5G Sub-6 in both SA and NSA, and is capable of download speeds of up to 4600Mbps thanks to 2x carrier aggregation, as well as upload speeds of up to 2500Mbps. We currently don’t have information on the 4G capabilities and if the carrier aggregation differs to the 5G abilities.
MediaTek describes its 5G modem implementation as extremely power efficient and claims it’s ahead of competing solutions in this regard, an interesting claim which hopefully we’ll maybe get to test in 2020.
The company says we’ll be seeing devices based on the new chipset later this year as well as in early 2020. Overall, it seems like MediaTek’s new push into 5G is a bigger than usual effort to try to re-enter the flagship device market, and based on pricing, the Dimensity 1000 should end up as a competitive offering.
Related Stories:
- MediaTek Announces 7nm 5G With Cortex-A77 CPU, Mali-G77 GPU Coming
- Intel and MediaTek Announce Partnership To Bring 5G Modems to PCs
- MediaTek Announces New Helio G90 Series SoCs: Gaming Focused Mid-Range
- Samsung Announces Exynos 990: 7nm EUV, M5, G77, LPDDR5 Flagship SoC alongside Exynos 5123 5G Modem
- Huawei Announces Kirin 990 and Kirin 990 5G: Dual SoC Approach, Integrated 5G Modem
42 Comments
View All Comments
Arnulf - Tuesday, November 26, 2019 - link
I happen to own a Sony Xperia E5, based on MT6735 SoC. It's stuck on Marshmallow it originally shipped with and since Mediatek's ecosystem is pretty much undocumented walled garden there is not a single community ROM for this device.I've read similar stories about other MTK-based devices so I avoid them at all cost.
Dragonstongue - Wednesday, November 27, 2019 - link
I own and still use a Redmi 5 Plus (Global)Works like a champ, the only thing I not like is having to time and time again force to higher volume level when it turns down to "prevent damage to hearing or speakers" warning
battery lasts many many many days between charges
I personally think these specs listed are awesome, how they are actually implemented is as per usual up to the OEM/AIB
however
4 cores running 600Mhz quicker than the 4 smaller ones, so much better than the normal ~300Mhz speed difference, says likely this will run very snappy overall, likely also not chew through battery reserves as bad as many of these so called "flagships" with much higher increased specs hampered by "few years back battery size limitations"
pretty sure ALL MAKERS can target a minimum of 4000 Mah with zero problems as well as include a 3.5mm jack AND wireless/bluetooth if they really wanted, you know so some folks who prefer not juicing their brains with EMF from BT/Wireless have the option (not to mention with a 3.5mm jack there is LOTS more you can do than BT/Wireless seems capable of..without costing 1/3 price of most phone to get the adapters (if you are lucky)
finally, while the name seems "odd"
I actually like it, odd but interesting, very unique as well ^.^
yeeeeman - Tuesday, November 26, 2019 - link
I think they are quite good.PeachNCream - Tuesday, November 26, 2019 - link
It isn't just the OEM that worries me. Google is also a problem just in general. Does AOSP do anything to keep Google from perving creeping all over your phone?phoenix_rizzen - Friday, November 29, 2019 - link
Driver support and working kernels for newer versions of Android has been an issue with MTK SoCs in the past.In theory, with the release of Project Treble (and the other projects that improve on that, I forget their code names, though), this shouldn't be as much of an issue going forward.
Any MTK device that ships with Android 9+ must support Project Treble. Thus, it will be possible to run generic system images on top.
SydneyBlue120d - Tuesday, November 26, 2019 - link
Is AV1 encoding supported?ksec - Tuesday, November 26, 2019 - link
Nope. And hopefully never.nandnandnand - Tuesday, November 26, 2019 - link
"And hopefully never."Why?
lilkwarrior - Tuesday, November 26, 2019 - link
That sounds like pure fanboy-driven hate on a royalty-free codec. What's your logic?Santoval - Tuesday, November 26, 2019 - link
I believe he/she was referring to the lower quality of hardware encoders compared with software encoders. This does not apply to hardware decoders because they do not tamper with the quality of the material, they just reproduce it.