Intel Expands 8th Gen Core: Core i9 on Mobile, Iris Plus, Desktop, Chipsets, and vPro
by Ian Cutress on April 3, 2018 3:01 AM ESTCoffee Lake Desktop Processors
The final part of the launch is focused around filling out the processor line-up for the desktop. Intel launched six Coffee Lake-based desktop processors back in October, so we have had almost a five month wait for the rest of the line to see the light of day. In this batch of processors we see the regular and low powered processors that normally sit in Intel’s strategy, as well as a number of Pentium and Celeron parts.
AnandTech | Cores | TDP | Freq | L3 | vPro | DRAM DDR4 |
iGPU | iGPU Turbo |
|
Core i7-8700K | $359 | 6 / 12 | 95 W | 3.7 / 4.7 | 12 MB | No | 2666 | 24 EUs | 1200 |
Core i7-8700 | $303 | 6 / 12 | 65 W | 3.2 / 4.6 | 12 MB | Yes | 2666 | 24 EUs | 1200 |
Core i7-8700T* | $303 | 6 / 12 | 35 W | 2.4 / 4.0 | 12 MB | Yes | 2666 | 24 EUs | 1200 |
For the Core i7 family, the new entrant is the Core i7-8700T. This will be the only six-core processor, with hyperthreading, to fall into the 35W bracket. It features the full L3 cache support, dual channel memory up to DDR4-2666, and is eligible for vPro support. It is worth noting that the 35W TDP value is only valid when the CPU is at its base frequency, which in this case is 2.4 GHz. At the peak turbo of 4.0 GHz, or for all-cores somewhere in the middle (again, Intel won’t specify), the power will obviously be higher.
AnandTech | Cores | TDP | Freq | L3 | vPro | DRAM DDR4 |
iGPU | iGPU Turbo |
|
Core i5-8600K | $257 | 6 / 6 | 95 W | 3.6 / 4.3 | 9 MB | No | 2666 | 24 EUs | 1150 |
Core i5-8600* | $213 | 6 / 6 | 65 W | 3.1 / 4.3 | 9 MB | Yes | 2666 | 24 EUs | 1150 |
Core i5-8600T* | $213 | 6 / 6 | 35 W | 2.3 / 3.7 | 9 MB | Yes | 2666 | 24 EUs | 1150 |
Core i5-8500* | $192 | 6 / 6 | 65 W | 3.0 / 4.1 | 9 MB | Yes | 2666 | 24 EUs | 1100 |
Core i5-8500T* | $192 | 6 / 6 | 35 W | 2.1 / 3.5 | 9 MB | Yes | 2666 | 24 EUs | 1100 |
Core i5-8400 | $182 | 6 / 6 | 65 W | 2.8 / 4.0 | 9 MB | No | 2666 | 24 EUs | 1050 |
Core i5-8400T* | $192 | 6 / 6 | 35 W | 1.7 / 3.3 | 9 MB | No | 2666 | 24 EUs | 1050 |
In the Core i5, most of the parts are new. As with the Core i5 desktop parts that are already launched, these have six-cores but do not have multithreading. They have a reduced L3 cache per core compared to the Core i7, and it is worth noting that the base frequency for the processors does not actually get that high – only 3.1 GHz for the Core i5-8600. All of the parts support dual channel DDR4-2666, and all but one processor supports vPro.
AnandTech | Cores | TDP | Freq | L3 | vPro | DRAM DDR4 |
iGPU | iGPU Turbo |
|
Core i3-8350K | $168 | 4 / 4 | 91 W | 4.0 | 8 MB | No | 2400 | 23 EUs | 1150 |
Core i3-8300* | $138 | 4 / 4 | 65 W | 3.7 | 8 MB | No | 2400 | 23 EUs | 1150 |
Core i3-8300T* | $138 | 4 / 4 | 35 W | 3.2 | 8 MB | No | 2400 | 23 EUs | 1100 |
Core i3-8100 | $117 | 4 / 4 | 65 W | 3.6 | 6 MB | No | 2400 | 23 EUs | 1100 |
Core i3-8100T* | $117 | 4 / 4 | 35 W | 3.1 | 6 MB | No | 2400 | 23 EUs | 1100 |
There are only three new members of the Core i3 section, all of which are quad-core processors. The two Core i3-8300/T parts have the peak 2MB L3 per core, while the Core i3-8100T only has 1.5 MB L3 per core. These parts are all reduced in memory frequency as well, supporting dual-channel DDR4-2400. Intel has no vPro parts in the Core i3 line, but all the Core i3 SKUs will support Optane.
AnandTech | Cores | TDP | Freq | L3 | DRAM DDR4 |
iGPU | iGPU Turbo |
|
Pentium Gold G5600 | $86 | 2 / 4 | 54 W | 3.9 | 4 MB | 2400 | UHD 630 | 350 / 1100 |
Pentium Gold G5500 | $75 | 2 / 4 | 54 W | 3.8 | 4 MB | 2400 | UHD 630 | 350 / 1100 |
Pentium Gold G5500T | $75 | 2 / 4 | 35 W | 3.2 | 4 MB | 2400 | UHD 630 | 350 / 1100 |
Pentium Gold G5400 | $64 | 2 / 4 | 54 W | 3.7 | 4 MB | 2400 | UHD 630 | 350 / 1050 |
Pentium Gold G5400T | $64 | 2 / 4 | 35 W | 3.1 | 4 MB | 2400 | UHD 630 | 350 / 1050 |
The Pentium Gold processors fit in where the older Core i3 processors once stood: dual core with hyperthreading. Intel rates the ‘full speed’ models at 54W, while the lower-power T-models are at 35W. One of the bigger disadvantages of these parts is the lack of Optane support, plus also the DDR4-2400 memory support, however they do fill up the lower cost market. Intel differentiates the Pentium Gold as having the latest Core microarchitecture compared to Pentium Silver which uses the Atom core design.
AnandTech | Cores | TDP | Freq | L3 | DRAM DDR4 |
iGPU | iGPU Turbo |
|
Celeron G4920 | $52 | 2 / 2 | 54 W | 3.2 | 2 MB | 2400 | UHD 610 | 350 / 1050 |
Celeron G4900 | $42 | 2 / 2 | 54 W | 3.1 | 2 MB | 2400 | UHD 610 | 350 / 1050 |
Celeron G4900T | $42 | 2 / 2 | 35 W | 2.9 | 2 MB | 2400 | UHD 610 | 350 / 1000 |
No real fancy words for Celeron here: these are Intel’s dual core designs for the cheapest Intel-based PCs. Just pair one up with a H310 motherboard, a single stick of memory, and a cheap HDD, and there’s a PC. What is different is that Intel has dropped the 'G' in the SKU name in the document they gave us (such as G4920). We have seen other documents from Intel that have the G, so we need see why there is a discrepancy.
Update: ARK confirms that all the Celerons have 'G' in the name.
* New Parts
** Blank spots in tables will be filled in as we get information
Per-Core Turbo Ratios
Due to some sleuthing, and despite Intel's insistence these are proprietary information, we have all the official per-core turbo ratios for this processors.
The most interesting element to these values are the 35W low-powered T processors. In each case, the all core turbo is much, much higher than the base frequency. For example, the Core i5-8400T has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz, but the all-core turbo is set at 3.0 GHz - almost double. Given the fact that TDP is defined at the base frequency, it is quite clear that the all-core turbo mode suggested to motherboard manufacturers is going to blow that 35W limit on the i5-8400T.
123 Comments
View All Comments
close - Wednesday, April 4, 2018 - link
If Apple does move to ARM (in a few years and only for lower powered models) the Y CPUs are the first to take the hit. There are very few ultraportables so successful to justify Intel's continued research in this. They already go out of mobile for the same reason, it's likely that in the future they will get out of the (ultra?) low power parts (under 10W).Sonic01 - Friday, April 6, 2018 - link
yeah that's what i was thinking... is there any news on the release date for these? I've just seen rumours of "late 2018", so I can only assume december...HStewart - Wednesday, April 4, 2018 - link
Actually an year and half since Q3 2016 - but it looks like 8th gen u series can be used in ultra lightsSonic01 - Friday, April 6, 2018 - link
yeah i realised after i posted but still. i know the U series are being used in ultra lights... but they still arent as ultra light as Y's.... all the U based ultrabooks start at 1.4KG and have cpu fans, my core Y ultrabook is 1KG and has no fans... oh well, will just have to keep waiting...Kakti - Sunday, April 8, 2018 - link
My Acer Switch Alpha 12 uses an i5-6200u, weighs 1.28 kg and is passively cooled. There's a few ultrabooks/tablets/2 in 1's that use u-series processors and no fans, but yeah they are rare. Personally I'd rather have a U processor for the added unmph...the 4.5w Y's will struggle to do much more than surf the web. Even high resolution video decoding can push past a Y processor's limits.serendip - Tuesday, April 10, 2018 - link
The Y segment is probably better served by much cheaper Atoms. I've run video transcodes on an Atom Windows tablet and it barely gets warm. I'd rather have decent sustained performance instead of a burst of speed that crashes hard from thermal limits.Alistair - Tuesday, April 3, 2018 - link
It's not even the products exactly that disappoint. The marketing is so bad....Just make it simple like Ryzen. No i5+, i5 means 6 core, 4 core hyper... I build computers all the time and I just feel tired reading that slide deck. Why should I memorize all that. Who cares...
satai - Tuesday, April 3, 2018 - link
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U - 4C/8TAMD Ryzen 7 1700(X) - 8C/16T
AMD Ryzen 7 2700(?) - probably 8C/16T
(Intel segmenting is a mess when considering features (ECC, management...) but why to bash them for C/T thread count that is pretty reasonable?)
Ratman6161 - Tuesday, April 3, 2018 - link
Also Ryzen 5 even in the desktop line has some 4C and some 6C that are all Ryzen 5Alistair - Tuesday, April 3, 2018 - link
When you buy Ryzen, you just buy the number of cores you want. Ignore everything else.The reason why Ryzen 5 1400 is a "5" is because if they called it a "3", that wouldn't make sense as it is about the same as an i7-7700. I think the Ryzen "5" confusion is a response to Intel's marketing more than anything else.